Previous post Next post

No Acceleration In Industry, Either

Industrial Production in the United States was flat in January 2017, following in December the first positive growth rate in over a year. The monthly estimates for IP are often subject to greater revisions than in other data series, so the figures for the latest month might change in the months ahead. Still, even with that in mind, there is no acceleration indicated for US industry. After suffering through a more than yearlong slump, and for the manufacturing segment two years, there really should be. That there isn’t any is indicative of the same lack of meaningful change as we find in other economic accounts.

Emerging from the dot-com recession, for example, IP proposed straight acceleration out of the contraction; beginning 2002 at -3.7% for January that year and then, in order, -3.1%, -2.1% -1.5%, -0.4%, +1.2%, +1.5%, and +1.7% for August 2002.

U.S. Industrial Production Jan 2000 - Jan 2017

(see more posts on U.S. Industrial Production, )
U.S. Industrial Production Jan 2000 - Jan 2017

- Click to enlarge

The seasonally-adjusted index level after bottoming out in March 2016 and hinting briefly at possible acceleration by July has instead followed the usual seasonal pattern and stalled out. The index estimate for January 2017 is almost exactly the same as July 2016.

U.S. Industrial Production Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

(see more posts on U.S. Industrial Production, )
U.S. Industrial Production Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

- Click to enlarge

This has occurred despite contributions again, on a month-to-month basis, from the oil sector. Going back to September, IP in this subcategory is up more than 4% to last month. Year-over-year production related to the mining for crude oil is down just 2.5% after falling at a nearly 10% rate in September.

U.S. Industrial Production, NSA Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

U.S. Industrial Production, NSA Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

- Click to enlarge

The lack of acceleration for US industry appears to be related in good part to domestic automobile production. Again, revisions might seriously change the monthly estimate, but as of the current figure auto assemblies for January were alarmingly low all over again. At just 11.42 million (SAAR), that nearly matched the lowest level (May 2016) of this break in the prior trend dating back to August 2015.

Motor Vehicle Assemblies, SA

Motor Vehicle Assemblies, SA

- Click to enlarge

Retail sales for automobiles had slightly improved in the latter half of last year, but clearly nowhere near enough to offset inventory levels accumulated during what amounted to a near-recession at the start of 2016. Automakers don’t appear to be yet enamored with the prospect for having dodged a possible recession, certainly not responding as if that case was meaningful in terms of a return to growth.

 

U.S. Industrial Production: Consumer Goods

U.S. Industrial Production: Consumer Goods

- Click to enlarge

Industrial production for consumer goods has been more or less similarly stuck, though given the utter lack of recovery since 2009 (despite clear recovery in automobiles during that time) it is difficult to distinguish more awful from the merely dreadful. It is these qualifications that actually matter.

U.S. Industrial Production: Consumer Goods, Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

U.S. Industrial Production: Consumer Goods, Jan 2006 - Jan 2017

- Click to enlarge

Dating back to the arrival of “global turmoil” in the late summer of 2015, coincident to the shift in auto assemblies, the IP index for the production of consumer goods has been flat. The level for January 2017 is 0.5% less than the level from August 2015.

U.S. Capacity Utilization, 2011 - 2017

U.S. Capacity Utilization, 2011 - 2017

- Click to enlarge

Not surprisingly, then, capacity utilization seems to have hit a ceiling (or floor, depending upon your outlook) where again no acceleration of activity is indicated. It is instead the same condition repeated once more only from a lower level this time as compared to 2012. Shallow contraction yielding to shallow growth is not a transition to growth but all contraction. That the positive numbers are uneven and not uniformly distributed only furthers this point. The economy is not healed having sidestepped possible recession last year, nor is it actually healing. It merely shifts between variable conditions of the same stagnation.

Potential Real GDP 1999Q1 - 2019Q1

Potential Real GDP 1999Q1 - 2019Q1

- Click to enlarge

Changing this set of economic circumstances would require something far more than doing more of the same differently. Even the Fed would agree, and has more subtly, that further “stimulus” even of the fiscal variety is not likely to do much. They make that determination from what they believe is a closed output gap (having no good idea how it closed), which is as good as any representation for what is truly wrong here. An economy doesn’t just shrink like it did in the Great “Recession” – proving that it wasn’t a recession.

A more proper term for it would be dislocation, as in the Great Dislocation which would indicate both a durable rupture but also that it could at some point, like a joint on the human body, be set back into place. The way to do that isn’t infrastructure spending or the possible, eventual repeal of Obamacare, it is what matches perfectly the before and after; there was steady and robust eurodollar growth before, and none after; there was worldwide and in some places (EM’s) robust economic expansion before, and none worldwide after.

TIC - U.S. Bank Data 1978 - 2016

TIC - U.S. Bank Data 1978 - 2016

- Click to enlarge

That correlation doesn’t suggest “stimulus” so much as putting a stop to “stimulus.” It didn’t accomplish anything before and there is a much better case to make that it might have helped make it worse. The Fed, at least, has thrown in the towel on recovery but that only means the actual answers lie in changing out the Fed. Until that happens, what you see immediately above will only continue and therefore also the lack of acceleration across the real economy; at least until the next “dollar” event queues.

TIC - U.S. Banking Data 1978 - 2016

TIC - U.S. Banking Data 1978 - 2016

- Click to enlarge


 

Full story here
Jeffrey P. Snider
Jeffrey P. Snider is the head of Global Investment Research of Alhambra Investment Partners (AIP). Jeffrey was 12 years at Atlantic Capital Management where he anticipated the financial crisis with critical research. His company is a global investment adviser, hence potential Swiss clients should not hesitate to contact AIP
Previous post See more for The United States Next post
Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Permanent link to this article: https://snbchf.com/2017/02/snider-us-industrial-production/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.