Previous post Next post

All roads lead to a euro zone break-up

For us all roads lead to a euro zone break-up and multiple sovereign defaults.


Our reasoning can be summarized as follows:

  1. Equities are worthless when associated debt becomes encumbered (risk capital takes the  first loss). Equity is not an asset; it is merely the remainder that is left over once debt is subtracted from assets.
  2. Recent GDP growth was possible only thanks to massive deficit spending and monetary easing; however, the marginal utility of additional debt and additional monetary easing is trending towards zero. Global debt has risen much faster than global GDP. The world has reached the Keynesian endpoint (where the economy cannot be stimulated anymore due to the weight of heavy debt burden). Increase in debt is inflationary, but high and stable debt as well as de-leveraging is deflationary.
  3. The 2008/9 financial crisis was contained thanks to governments (read: taxpayers) absorbing bank debt. Any progress households made on de-leveraging has been added back onto them via bailouts. Meanwhile, the escape hatch of government bail-outs is closed as many governments face insolvency. Capital markets deny refinancing their considerable mountains of debt.
  4. The US has the advantage of producing the world’s reserve currency, guaranteeing access to most commodities. This will hold true even in case the dollar is being further devalued, as long as key commodities are priced in dollars. Trillions of US dollars have found their way into the balance sheets of foreign central banks; the burden of devaluation is hence shared with millions of unsuspecting Chinese, Japanese, Russians and others.
  5. Europe, however, is unable to solve its crisis due to insurmountable differences in fiscal policies, trade balances and scarred memories of hyperinflation in the past century.

There are only two solutions to the Euro zone crisis:

2 solutions for euro zone will work acceptable for Germany


  • Jokes aside, the Euro-crisis will only be solved once the causes (trade imbalances, high deficits) are removed.
  • Trade imbalances can only be healed by relative improvement in unit labor costs between the North and the South
  • This can only be achieved through
    (1) severe deflation for the PIIGS- leading to social unrest – or
    (2) devaluation by the PIIGS – meaning Euro exit or
    (3) substantial inflation in Germany (unlikely to happen).
  • Fiscal deficits can only be reduced by austerity (higher taxes, lower spending, or both). Stalling economic growth will lead to higher unemployment and possibly social unrest.
  • Another alternative is to default on debt (which, coincidentally, would also be the consequence of a Euro-exit).
  • In the end, all roads lead to a euro zone break-up and multiple sovereign defaults.



Euro zone Ratings map with new iron curtain

In the above map you will notice the red “demarcation” line between A- and non-A-rated countries. It is the divide between the fiscally responsible North and the profligate South & East.

 Germany and France are number 1 and 2 EU members by GDP, and together account for 36% of the EU’s economic power (29% of population). But France is culturally closer to Italy and Spain; it historically had a weak currency, and frequently suffered devaluations in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (the managed floating rate mechanism before the introduction of the Euro). It is clear that as the Franco-German axis breaks, the European project is dead.

CONCLUSION: Sooner or later, something has got to give. There are no good outcomes. Deleveraging of excessive debt levels hurts, especially if the country seen as imposing those conditions is doing relatively fine. A Euro-exit by Germany, possibly together with the Netherlands, would be the least catastrophic “solution”, allowing the rest of Europe to regain competitiveness by weakening their Euro. However, such an outcome is unlikely, as Germany would be seen as the one ending European integration (and, in addition, losing all control over the fiscal policies of its neighbors).


Lighthouse Investment ManagementAlexander Gloy is founder and president of Lighthouse Investment Management.

Are you the author?
About Alex Gloy
Alex Gloy
Alex Gloy: Founder, President and Chief Investment Officer of Lighthouse Investment Management Born in Hamburg, Germany, Mr. Gloy started his financial career as a trainee in the Deutsche Bank Apprenticeship Program at the Hamburg Stock Exchange. He graduated from the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) with an MBA in 1994. Following his MBA he joined Credit Suisse, Zurich, in European Equity Sales. Mr. Gloy then served as the German Equity Market Strategist before heading the European Equity Research Team in Credit Suisse Private Banking. After moving to New York in 1999 he worked in Swiss and European Equity Sales. Mr. Gloy spent the last three years at Sal. Oppenheim as Head of their Swiss Equity Sales Desk. From 1994 to 1998 he continued to work with his Alma Matter and its Institute of Finance, preparing students for their final Finance exam.
Previous post See more for 2.) Euro Exit Next post
Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

🤞 Don’t miss posts anymore!
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Permanent link to this article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.