About Charles Hugh Smith
My articles My offerMy siteAbout meMy videosMy books
Follow on:TwitterFacebookYoutubeAmazon
If the “experts” were assessed on results, they’d all be fired.
The mainstream media continually hypes the authority of “experts,” i.e. people with a stack of credentials from top institutions.
But does the mainstream media ever check on whether the “experts” got anything right? Let’s compare the “experts” (conventional PhD economists) diagnoses and fixes with the results of their policies.
Let’s stick to the big issues: inflation, productivity, near-zero interest rate policy (ZIRP), employment and “growth”. If you get these wrong, you get the entire economy wrong.
If you can’t get the big issues right, your “expertise” has failed: your “expertise” is not just worthless, it’s counter-productive, because if common-sense policies had been put in place instead of the “experts'” fixes, we’d have made progress rather than digging a deeper hole.
1. Inflation. Conventional “experts” believe inflation has been near-zero for the past decade and will continue to be near-zero as far as the eye can see.
Did they get this right? No. Households exposed to healthcare, higher education and rental expenses have seen staggering increases in costs for the same (or diminished) services. In other words, the purchasing power of their earnings has plummeted.
| If we measure these “Big Ticket” items, we find inflation rates of 100+% over the past decade. I laid this out in detail in The Burrito Index: Consumer Prices Have Soared 160% Since 2001 |
Personal Consumption Expenditures - Click to enlarge |
| The “experts” solution to out-of-control costs is to borrow trillions of dollars— in other words, the “fix” to out-of-control costs is out-of-control borrowing.
And remember: borrowing is nothing but consuming future earnings today, leaving less disposable income to spend in the future as interest payments eat the borrower alive. |
Federal government; consumer credit, student loans: asset, Level - Click to enlarge |
| 2. Productivity. The honest “experts” admit they are flummoxed by the steep decline in productivity, which is the only enduring source of higher wages and profits.
The “experts” are blind to the diminishing returns on financialization and globalization–the two engines of corporate profitability. |
U.S. Real Output per Hour - Click to enlarge |
|
3. Zero interest rate policy (ZIRP). The “experts” at the Federal Reserve and elsewhere claimed that near-zero interest rates were the fix-all solution to low growth in GDP, employment, wages and business investment.
Precisely what’s been fixed by ZIRP?
We know the answer to the other side of that question: What’s been destroyed by ZIRP? Savers and pension funds. The hundreds of billions of dollars in interest income that once flowed to savers, pension funds, etc. have been diverted to banks and borrowers–except those paying 19% interest on credit cards.
The truth is ZIRP has been a gift to banks, lenders and corporations borrowing immense sums to buy back their own shares. There’s no mystery why productivity has plummeted; the borrowed money went to boost stock options and financial games, not productive investments.
The ZIRP/NIRP Gods and their PhD Priesthood Have Failed (September 20, 2016)
|
Effective Federal Funds Rate - Click to enlarge |
| 4. Employment. Statistical trickery cannot disguise the reality that meaningful employment (permanent, full-time) has weakened structurally, and the number of adults in the workforce with jobs has also weakened. |
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate - Click to enlarge |
| A handful of high-profile economists (Michael Spence et al.) have addressed the issue of automation, and concluded that “software eating the world” is weakening employment across the spectrum from high-skill to low-skill. |
Employment-Population Ratio - Click to enlarge |
| The conventional “experts” either ignore the issue, don’t understand it, or cling to a cargo-cult-like belief that “technology always creates more jobs than it destroys,” but with zero evidence to back up this faith-based assertion. |
Employment, Usually Work Full Time - Click to enlarge |
|
5. Growth. Few “experts” dare address stagnation and the Keynesian obsession with “growth” on a planet with declining resources (have you looked at fresh water recently? Central banks can’t print it) and rising competition for what’s left.
The “experts” reckoned that making borrowing cheaper would spur “growth”–but once again, they ignored the diminishing returns on cheap credit:
|
|
|
This chart is bank credit. Add in corporate, household and government debt, and you get a picture of massive increases in debt yielding pathetically low “growth” in GDP.
The “experts” are also flummoxed by the collapse of new business growth. How many conventional PhD economists have made a big-time academic or government career studying the stultifying consequence of over-regulation and regulatory capture by corporate cartels? How about the rise of local government junk fees and the crushing burdens of providing healthcare for employees?
|
Net Annual change in the Number of firms - Click to enlarge |
|
Whatever GDP growth did occur did not generate higher wages. Wages for the bottom 95% stagnated or declined when adjusted for inflation.
In the five dynamics that matter, the “experts” are 0 for 5. Malinvestment fueled by cheap credit, financialization, perverse incentives, over-regulation, the crushing pressure of soaring healthcare costs, the strangulation of small business– these are not independent dynamics, they are causally linked.
|
GDP per Capita, Median household income - Click to enlarge |
If the “experts” were assessed on results, they’d all be fired. Eight years of failure and counterproductive consequences is enough to declare the “experts” are only “experts” in generating excuses and failed fixes to systemic ills.
My new book is The Adventures of the Consulting Philosopher: The Disappearance of Drake. For more, please visit the book's website.
Full story here
Are you the author?
At readers' request, I've prepared a biography. I am not confident this is the right length or has the desired information; the whole project veers uncomfortably close to PR. On the other hand, who wants to read a boring bio? I am reminded of the "Peanuts" comic character Lucy, who once issued this terse biographical summary: "A man was born, he lived, he died." All undoubtedly true, but somewhat lacking in narrative.
Tags: newslettersent,U.S. Gross Domestic Product
