Previous post Next post

The 4.0 percent Rule Is Dead. What Should Retirees Do Now?

 

The 4% Rule Is Dead. A recent article by Shawn Langlois via MarketWatch pointed out this sobering fact but is one we have discussed previously. Retirees have long counted on being able to retire on their assets and take out 4% each year. However, a little more than 20-years later, the “death of the withdrawal rate” has arrived. What should retirees do now?

As noted by Shawn:

“The 4% Rule has long been used as a guideline for retirees in determining how much they should be able to withdraw from their retirement account while still maintaining a balance that will allow for the same income stream to flow through their golden years.”

The idea of the 4% rule originally suggested that once retired, the portfolio allocation is shifted to ultra-safe Treasury bonds.

Interest Rates, 1998 - 2020

Interest Rates, 1998 - 2020

- Click to enlarge

Such an allocation shift provided for the income required to live on, plus a Government guarantee of the principal.

Here’s the problem.

When the 4% rule was put into place, Treasury yields were 5%. Today, they are closing in on 0.5%.

This is a massive problem for retirees today. As shown, $1 million will no longer generate a $50,000 income for retirement. Today, it is just $6900/year.

How Much Will 1 million Generate, 1998 - 2020

How Much Will 1 million Generate, 1998 - 2020

- Click to enlarge

Even more shocking has been the speed of the change. In 2016, it took roughly $5 million to generate $50,000/year. Just 4-years later, that number has skyrocketed to over $8 million.

How Much do you need for 50000 per year, 1998 - 2020

How Much do you need for 50000 per year, 1998 - 2020

- Click to enlarge

For both young savers, and boomers approaching retirement, the challenges of planning for retirement today are daunting.

The Next Bear Market Is Coming

The Next Bear Market Is Coming

- Click to enlarge

Problem #1: Very Few People Have $8 Million

While it is nice to think that throwing a few shekels into the market will magically turn into millions, the reality is far different. As discussed in “Why Are Boomers So Broke,” after two of the greatest bull markets in U.S. history during their lifetime, the savings statistics are depressing.

For many reasons, individuals simply don’t save money. Currently, almost 60% of ALL WORKING-AGE individuals DO NOT own assets in a retirement account. 

No/Has Retirement Account

No/Has Retirement Account

- Click to enlarge

However, it’s actually more dismal than that. The typical working-age household has ZERO DOLLARS in retirement account assets. Importantly, “baby boomers” who are nearing retirement had an average of just $40,000 saved for their “golden years.”

Lastly, only 4-0ut-of-5 working-age households have retirement savings of less than one times their annual income. This does not bode well for the sustainability of living standards in the “golden years.”

Savings Balance

Savings Balance

- Click to enlarge

According to the study by MagnifyMoney:

“Although the average American household has saved roughly $175,000 in various types of savings accounts, only the top 10 percent to 20 percent of earners will likely have savings levels approaching or exceeding that amount. 29 percent of households have less than $1,000 in savings.”

You can’t get to $8 million if you can’t save to start with.

Newsletter Banner

Newsletter Banner

- Click to enlarge

Problem #2: Can’t Save For Retirement

The ability of people to save money has become substantially more problematic. I showed the following chart recently, which illustrates the gap between income, savings, and the cost of living.

“The continued increases in debt, which was used to fill the gap between income and the cost of living, contributed to the retardation of economic growth.”

Debt Consumption GDP GAP, 1959 - 2019

Debt Consumption GDP GAP, 1959 - 2019

- Click to enlarge

When viewing the “saving problem” from this perspective, it is easy to understand the survey responses from Kiplinger and Personal Capital. Americans said the biggest roadblocks to saving for retirement were:

  • The high cost of health insurance. “From 1999 to 2017, the cost of family health insurance coverage has more than doubled the amount of take-home pay it consumes.”
  • Disappointing investment performance. “Just under 30% of all respondents (29.4%) said that disappointing investment performance had stopped them from saving as much as they would have liked to for retirement.”
  • The amount of consumer debt they carried. “21.3% of Americans said that debt, not including student loans, kept them from saving for retirement combined with the increased costs of living.”

While the Fed keeps inflating stock markets, the “trickle-down” effect has yet to occur.

Million Doesnt Cut It Anymore, 1959 - 2019

Million Doesnt Cut It Anymore, 1959 - 2019

- Click to enlarge

Problem #3: Don’t Forget The Inflation

In 1980, $1 million would generate between $100,000 and $120,000 per year while the cost of living for a family of four in the U.S. was approximately $20,000/year. Today, there is about a $50,000 shortfall between the income $1 million will generate and the cost of living.

This is just a rough calculation based on historical averages. However, the amount of money you need in retirement is based on what you think your income needs will be when you get there.

For most, there is a desire to live a similar, or better, lifestyle in retirement. However, over time our standard of living will increase with respect to our life-cycle stages. Children, bigger houses to accommodate those children, education, travel, etc. all require higher incomes. (Which is the reason the U.S. has the largest retirement savings gap in the world.)

Savings Gap, 2015 - 2050

Savings Gap, 2015 - 2050

- Click to enlarge

If you are in the latter camp, like me, a “million dollars ain’t gonna cut it.”

Subscribe YOUTUBE

Subscribe YOUTUBE

- Click to enlarge

n is 23 years old and earns $40,000 a year.

  • He saves $14 a day
  • At 67 he will have $1 million saved up (assuming he actually gets that 6% annual rate of return)
  • He then withdraws 4% of the balance to live on matching his $40,000 annual income.

That pretty straightforward math.

IT’S ENTIRELY WRONG.

The living requirement in 44 years is based on today’s income level, not the future income level required to maintain the current living standard. 

Look at the chart below and select your current level of income. The number on the left is your income level today and the number on the right is the amount of income you will need in 30-years to live the same lifestyle you are living today.

The Inflation-Equation

This is based on the average inflation rate over the last two decades of 2.1%. However, if inflation runs hotter in the future, these numbers become materially larger.

Here is the same chart lined out.

The chart above exposes two problems with the entire premise:

  • The required income is not ad

30-Year Inflation Adjusted Income Levels

30-Year Inflation Adjusted Income Levels

- Click to enlarge

lass=”pf-content”>

Start Rethinking Your Plan

The analysis above reveals the important points individuals should consider in their financial planning process:

  • Expectations for future returns and withdrawal rates should be downwardly adjusted.
  • The potential for front-loaded returns going forward is unlikely.
  • The impact of taxation must be considered in the planned withdrawal rate.
  • Future i

30-Year Inflation Adjusted Incomes, 1988 - 2018

30-Year Inflation Adjusted Incomes, 1988 - 2018

- Click to enlarge

y of people working well into their retirement years.

Amount Needed To Fund Retirement

Amount Needed To Fund Retirement

- Click to enlarge

Start Rethinking Your Plan

The analysis above reveals the important points individuals should consider in their financial planning process:

  • Expectations for future returns and withdrawal rates should be downwardly adjusted.
  • The potential for front-loaded returns going forward is unlikely.
  • The impact of taxation must be considered in the planned withdrawal rate.
  • Future inflation expectations must be carefully considered.
  • Drawdowns from portfolios during declining market environments accelerate the principal bleed. Plans should be made during up years to harbor capital for reduced portfolio withdrawals during adverse market conditions.
  • The yield chase over the last 11-years, and low interest rate environment, has created an extremely risky environment for retirement income planning. Caution is advised.
  • Expectations for compounded annual rates of returns should be dismissed in lieu of plans for variable rates of future returns.

Investing for retirement, no matter what age you are should be done conservatively and cautiously with the goal of outpacing inflation over time. This doesn’t mean you should never invest in the stock market, it just means that your portfolio should be constructed to deliver a rate of return sufficient to meet your long-term goals with as little risk as possible.

RIAPRO Dont Invest Alone Banner

RIAPRO Dont Invest Alone Banner

- Click to enlarge

 

Full story here Are you the author?
Lance Roberts
Finally, financial news that makes sense. Lance Roberts, the host of "StreetTalkLive", has a unique ability to bring the complex world of economics, investing and personal financial wealth building to you in simple, easy and informative ways but also makes it entertaining to listen to at the same time.
Previous post See more for 9) Personal Investment Next post
Tags: ,,

Permanent link to this article: https://snbchf.com/2020/08/roberts-4-rule-dead-retirees/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.