The news media has been reporting steady job growth in the US economy since the Covid 19 crisis. Employment has grown steadily. However, data on employment represents progress in the number of jobs filled. The total number of jobs in business plans is the sum of all filled and unfilled jobs, total employees plus total job openings (see the red line in the top-left graph below).
The total number of jobs in the US economy increased rapidly up to March 2022. Total filled and unfilled jobs have fluctuated since March 2022, with little increase. Why have businesses been planning for relatively few new jobs? It appears that low businesses confidence has put a damper on business plans to create additional jobs. Growth of fixed nonresidential fixed investment peaked in the second quarter of 2021, at the same time that growth of business confidence peaked (see the top right graph below). Business confidence began to decline in the second quarter of 2022, by which time fixed nonresidential investment settled in at a lower growth rate. Businesses are still investing in capital, but we must remember that businesses need to do some capital investment just to replace old-depreciated equipment.
Changes in small business optimism have been significant (see the bottom graph). There was a large increase in small business optimism around November 2016. Small business optimism fell in 2021, and settled in a a low level since June of 2022. Relative lack of investment and planned job growth in the US likely will have serious long term consequences for our future wages and incomes.
The puzzling part of all of this is that business profits have been relatively high in the past few years. Why has business confidence fallen while profits are relatively high?
Entrepreneurs plan investment in new jobs based on expected economic conditions, not just on recent profits. Most US businesses have done well, financially, in the past few years, but the regulatory environment has changed. The Biden administration has imposed stricter regulations on businesses. We should consider the possibility that entrepreneurs fear losing effective control of their businesses, as the regulatory environment in the US becomes more strict and intrusive.
[Originally published at On the Other Hand...]
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
Full story here Are you the author?You Might Also Like
Covid Showed Us Who Really Rules America
2024-03-14
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
Website powered by Mises Institute donors
Mises Institute is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions are tax-deductible to the full extent the law allows. Tax ID# 52-1263436
A Free and Open Internet Is a Threat to the Establishment
2023-12-27
Last week, a video clip of Francis Fukuyama went viral. In the clip, the political scientist called freedom of speech and a marketplace of ideas “18th century notions that really have been belied (or shown to be false) by a lot of what’s happened in recent decades.”
Fukuyama then reflects on how a censorship regime could be enacted in the United States.
But the question then becomes, how do you actually regulate content that you think is noxious, harmful, and the like—and do it in a way that’s consistent with the First Amendment? Now, I think you can push the boundaries a bit because the First Amendment does not allow you to say anything you want. But among liberal democracies, our First Amendment law is among the most expansive of any developed democracy.
And you could imagine a future
2024’s Deficit Is Already on Track to Be the Worst Since Covid
2023-12-25
Weakness in the US economy continues to hide behind surging debt levels and government spending. As noted last month by Daniel LaCalle,
[A] large part of the growth in GDP came from bloated government spending financed with more debt and inventory revaluation, adding 0.8 and 1.4 percentage points to GDP growth. …
The increase in gross domestic product between the third quarter of 2022 and the same period of 2023 was a mere $414.3 billion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, while the increase in public debt was $1.3 trillion ($32.3 to $33.6 trillion, according to the Treasury).
The United States is now in the worst year of growth, excluding public debt accumulation since the thirties.
This trend is continuing at least into the first quarter of the new fiscal year, as it is
How the Free Market Drove History’s “Great Enrichment”
2023-12-22
Beyond Positivism, Behaviorism, and Neoinstitutionalism in Economicsby Deirdre Nansen McCloskeyUniversity of Chicago Press, 2022; 222 pp.
Deirdre McCloskey is a great economic historian, and in Beyond Positivism, she makes a number of valuable points that draw from her immense learning in this field. I’d like to concentrate on a few of these insights in this week’s column.
She stresses the importance of the “Great Enrichment,” the process by which the free market has, by rescuing millions from poverty, increased longevity and bettered conditions of life and material well-being far beyond all previous advancements. Concerning this, she says:
We economists have been trying ever since 1776 to explain the Great Enrichment. About the lower end of the Great Enrichment, the economic historian
Tags: Featured,newsletter
