The Parasites Begin to Attach Themselves
BALTIMORE – “Tommy… who are you voting for?”
We put the question to a local bulldozer operator whom we’ve known for at least half a century. Tommy, now 80 years old, is the last of a dying breed. He grew up plowing the earth to grow tobacco on Maryland’s Tidewater, on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay.
In the 1970s, when tobacco farming became unprofitable, he switched from plowing the earth to moving it around. He is still at it. And as near as we can tell, he will go on with it until his eyes give out… or his mind fails and he knocks over a suburban house by accident.
In the meantime, he pushes dirt in the same spirit we write these Diary entries – with the happy nonchalance of a hen laying an egg. It was Memorial Day weekend. Hot and humid already. We had asked him to come over to see about taking out some trees.
In Maryland, trees grow fast. If you leave them on either side of a field, pretty soon you don’t have any pasture left… just a shady spot between the tall trees. Tommy’s family has been in this area for about 300 years. Like the few old-timers left in the area, he speaks with a distinctive accent – more like the Deep South than the Baltimore metropolitan area.
“Vote? I ‘ow know. None uv’em worth a damn, near’s I kin tel.”
The GOP unity tracker…Bloomberg has a “unity tracker” that tells us how well Donald Trump is doing at getting Republicans in line behind him. It is a survey of Republican politicians, large donors, and otherwise important “conservatives.” So far, 65% are with “The Donald.” Only 1.8% are abstaining. |
Our guess is the list of Trump’s supporters will grow. Elections, like lotteries, bring in the crowds. People know that you gotta play to win. A Trump donor has about 50-50 odds that his investment will pay off. An abstainer will get nothing.
So, the cronies, the zombies, the Deep State operatives, contractors, suppliers – all are hitching themselves to the bright star of reality TV’s Donald Trump – or the twinkling of the coy Planet Clinton.
Roger Stone, Corey Lewandowski, Steven Mnuchin, Paul Manafort, and Laurance Gay – the Trump team overflows with hacks, lobbyists, and insider dealers already. They are busy making promises to line up even more support: a new highway for one district, a new prison for another, more drones, more benefits for federal retirees, more drugs, more this, more that. All of it at someone else’s expense, of course.
Ms. Clinton has even more promisers on her team. Mr. Trump says his campaign team numbers only about 75 people. Ms. Clinton will have 800 grasping parasites to look out for if she wins the White House.
Bernie Sanders – Best of a Bad Lot?
At the Diary, we favor lost causes, die-hards, and underdogs. Neither Clinton nor Trump fill the bill. But Sanders? Tommy rated the candidates:
“Bernie Sanders is prolly the best uva bad lot. His ideas are turrble, but he seems like a decent fella. And since nobody ever thought he’d git this fahr, I reckon he didn’t haf to make no promises along the way. Besides, dere ain’t no way Congress would do anything he wanted anyhow. The people who run things don’t care what he thinks. What’s more, he’ll prolly be dead in a few yeeahs. Then he won’t be able to do no more harm.”
Tommy may be the only voter to see Sanders’ shorter life expectancy as a campaign plus. But he’s not the only one to see that it doesn’t matter what Sanders’ thinks or wants. The Deep State calls the important shots. The only thing we’re pretty sure of is that the “people who run things don’t care what he thinks.”
Bernie Sanders: Too old to rock’n’roll, too young to die…low life expectancy as a campaign plus? Historically, it has often been the case. The best presidents were those with the shortest lifespans. They never got around to doing much harm, in line with Tommy’s observation…like William Henry Harrison, who spent a mere 31 days in office.
The system changed in 1971, when President Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard. Since then, the powers that be no longer depended on Congress… or savers…or voters… to raise the funds they needed. The feds could run huge deficits – no matter who was in office. Wall Street could earn huge fees, too, from lending out money that no one ever saved.
“I remember in the ’70s,” said Tommy, as the conversation turned to money.
“The banks used to want your binez. They’d give you a free toaster oven just for opnin an account. Now, they act like they don’t know me or evn want my money. If I had any money. I’m 80 yeeahs old, and I’m workin’ just like I did 50 yeeahs ago. ‘Cept now I got less money den I had den.”
Why don’t the banks want our money? They no longer need it. When banks make a loan, they create new deposit balances on the spot, using nothing more than a few keystrokes on a computer. There’s no need for pre-existing savings.
But real resources – time and money – are limited. Pretending otherwise, by lending empty credit as though it were real savings, misled investors and consumers.
Instead of carefully applying their precious capital to projects that would pay off, they began throwing it around – on zero-down mortgages, executive bonuses, share buybacks, McMansions, and multimillion-dollar “art.”
The “seed corn” that should have increased productivity and higher wages was squandered. Instead, we have financially modified pseudo credit-corn; it looks just like the real thing, but it produces no crop.
“Misallocation of resources,” we said to Tommy, explaining why we are no richer today than we were 40 years ago – and how “free” money poisons an economy.
“I dunno ‘bout dat. But if ya want dem trees pooshed down, I’ll poosh ‘em for ya.”
Image captions by PT
Addendum: Parasite Bonus Pics
The above article originally appeared as “Bernie Sanders – The Best of a Bad Bunch?“ at the Diary of a Rogue Economist, written for Bonner & Partners.
Full story here Are you the author? Previous post See more for Next post
Tags: Bernie Sanders,Deep State,Donald Trump,newslettersent,On Politics