In early September 2023 we reported on the Producer Price Index, the PPI. This price statistic takes a back seat to the Consumer Price Index in media reporting and the policy-setting agenda. Back then we explained what it was and what it was telling us about the economy.
The timing of that episode reflected our concern that the sharp drop in the PPI to that point in time might not be a sign of things to come. The PPI had been dropping since mid-2022. Regular listeners will recall our regular discussions and doubts about the Fed’s battle against inflation.
So how does the PPI look six months later?
Since the last episode on PPI, the decline has stopped and the Producer Price Index has leveled off instead of continuing its decline. Since the report for December 2023, the next three reports registered increases in PPI.
The latest monthly report showed an increase of two percent, which is actually less than consensus forecasts! However,
- On a year-over-year basis, compared with the level twelve months ago, this month saw the largest gain since April of 2023, indicating that pressures in consumer price inflation is building up in the pipeline or structure of the economy, which stretches from the forests, mines, farms, and wells of the economy to the shelves of Walmart.
- Close to our end of the pipeline, the prices of wholesale goods dropped 0.1 percent after rising 1.2 percent in February. But this decrease in the latest report is due to the 1.6 percent drop in wholesale energy prices. The drop in wholesale energy prices was offset by a big 0.8 percent increase in wholesale foods. If you don’t consider food and energy prices, the overall PPI was up 0.1 percent for the month.
- Producer services rose 0.3 percent, and the adjusted figure is even higher for the third straight monthly gain.
- Just for your information, the price of copper has been up 6 percent since the beginning of the month, and crude oil is up 2 percent.
The producer goods pipeline that was driving the decrease in Consumer Price Index inflation down from 9 percent to over 3 percent has clearly stabilized and is less likely to contribute to the Fed’s meeting its 2 percent target. With categories like wage rates and prices of services continuing to rise, how will it reach its target short of throwing the economy into a crisis?
The producer price pipeline is wide and deep, with each stage for each consumer price having multiple stages with an array of its own pipelines and warehouse inventories of inputs. That pipeline might be stacked with gestating price increases for consumers, although nothing guarantees retailers and wholesalers that they will get their money back or make a profit on those past purchases.
If commodity food inflation spreads throughout the entire category and if energy prices continue to strengthen, the Fed’s immaculate disinflation to get back to its target without wrecking the economy and stock market is in serious doubt, especially with interest rates already heading higher and the price of gold at an all-time record high.
Note: The views expressed on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.
Full story here Are you the author?
You Might Also Like
“Nonsense on Stilts”: The Rhetorical Cornerstone of the American Welfare/Warfare State
2024-02-09
In a 1922 essay about Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address in his book Prejudices: Third Series H.L. Mencken asked, “Am I the first American to note the fundamental nonsensicality of the Gettysburg Address”? One example of the nonsense of Lincoln’s rhetoric as explained by Mencken is as follows:
“Think of the argument in it. Put it into the cold words of everyday. The doctrine is simply this: that the Union soldiers who died at Gettysburg sacrificed their lives to the cause of self-determination – that government of the people, by the people, for the people, should not perish from the earth. It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of their people to govern
The Double-Edged Sword of School Choice
2024-02-09
School Choice has become a hot button political topic, especially for right-wing America. Conservatives, libertarians, and everyone that is to the left of the Democratic Party have grown increasingly more skeptical of the public education system. Between ideological indoctrination, what might be rightfully described as “grooming” into social contagions, and declining educational gains, public education has demonstrated its utter failures.
The obvious alternative to many conservatives and libertarians is school choice. School choice has a variety of forms, but all are focused on a core idea: that government funding of schools should follow students (rather than go directly to districts) to allow competition between schools. Surely, it does follow that allowing choice might improve quality.
Tags: Featured,newsletter
