Previous post Next post

Alabama House Considers Eliminating Income Taxes on Gold and Silver

Representative Sorrell has introduced House Bill 122, a tax-neutral measure to exclude from gross income any net capital gain and any net capital loss derived from the exchange of precious metals bullion.

Policies that penalize savers in precious metals reduce the likelihood that Alabama citizens will take prudent steps to insulate themselves from the inflation and financial turmoil caused by the Federal Reserve.

In recent years, legislation to remove capital gains taxes currently assessed on the sale of the monetary metals progressed through several state legislatures – Wyoming and Arizona were the last two states to remove income taxes from constitutional money. Alabama ought to be the next.

Here are a few reasons why slapping an income tax on the monetary metals is wrong:

  • Current Alabama law assesses taxes on imaginary gains. Under current law, a taxpayer who sells precious metals may end up with a capital “gain” in terms of Federal Reserve Notes. This capital “gain” is not necessarily a real gain, it’s often a nominal gain that results from the inflation created by the Federal Reserve and the attendant decline in the dollar’s purchasing power.

Yet this nominal gain is taxed at the federal level – and, because Alabama uses federal adjusted gross income (AGI) as a starting point for Alabama income calculations, this nominal gain is taxed again by Alabama.

  • Inflation harms the poorest among us. Inflation is a regressive tax. The hardest hit are wage earners, savers, and pensioners on fixed incomes – as well as those who own few or no tangible assets.
  • HB 122 is a tax neutral measure – it excludes any gains OR losses on the monetary metals. Investments in precious metals coins and bullion are rightly exempt from Alabama’s sales tax. Neutralizing Alabama’s income tax treatment of the monetary metals would remove the last major disincentive in Alabama that stands against the ownership and use of the monetary metals.

This legislation would simply cause taxpayers to back out any “gains” OR “losses” on gold and silver that were reported on their federal returns. Alabama would assume a neutral stance as to taxation of the only form of money mentioned in U.S. Constitution.

This measure is one of many sound money bills being introduced across the country this year. Recently having removed all taxes on gold and silver, Wyoming plans to consider a measure to empower the state treasurer to hold physical gold and silver in state coffers. Several bills to remove taxation on sound, constitutional money are also being, or have been, introduced in Tennessee, Hawaii, South Carolina, Idaho, and Mississippi.

Backed by the Sound Money Defense League, these measures protect Alabama citizens by removing barriers to insulating their wealth with the only money proven to protect against the Federal Reserve Note’s ongoing devaluation.

Full story here Are you the author?
About Jp Cortez
Jp Cortez
Jp Cortez is a graduate of Auburn University, a current law school student, and a resident of Charlotte, North Carolina. He is a Mises University alumnus. He is the Assistant Director of the Sound Money Defense League, an organization which is working to bring back gold and silver as America's constitutional money.
Previous post See more for 6a.) Gold Standard Next post

Permanent link to this article:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.