Previous post Next post

UN group demands reversal of Swiss minaret ban

UN group demands reversal of Swiss minaret ban

The country voted narrowly in 2009 to ban the building of minarets. (Keystone)

Switzerland should take steps to ensure that people’s initiatives do not contravene international law, the United Nations Human Rights Committee says. It notably called for the repeal of a Swiss vote banning the construction of minarets.

The recommendations, released Thursday, came after the fourth periodic review of Switzerland by the members of the UN Human Rights Committee earlier in July.

Though broadly positive, the 18-member panel found that several people’s initiatives in recent years conflicted with Swiss obligations as a signatory of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

As well as voicing concern about the proposed “auto-determination initiative” – which would place Swiss law above international law – the final report notably criticised the prohibition of minaret construction in Switzerland, voted in 2009.

“The banning of minarets should be repealed”, said the committee vice-president Yuval Shany, speaking to journalists in Geneva.

However, beyond revoking the relevant article of the Swiss constitution, Shany did not give any indication of what concrete measures the country could take to ensure better future harmonisation between domestic people’s initiatives and international obligations.

Treatment of minorities

Generally, the committee said that it was “impressed by the positive developments” in Switzerland since 2009, the last time it met to appraise the country.

It highlighted for praise the establishing of the National Commission for the Prevention of Tortureexternal link (NCPT), in 2010, as well as a 2012 law aiming do more to combat forced marriages.

However, it did raise concern about several areas – mainly involving religious discrimination and police discrimination against ethnic minorities.

Beyond the minaret recommendation, several initiatives against the wearing of the Muslim veil – so called “burka bans” – as well as religiously-driven rulings in some Basel schools, were labelled a worrying “accumulation” by Shany.

The committee also cited cases of police action taken against minorities, including the case of a Nigerian man who died in Zurich in 2010 while undergoing forced deportation.

To tackle such treatment and ensure the responsible actors are brought to justice, the committee recommended that an independent complaint mechanism which would investigate allegations of police violence be set up.

Following the recommendations of the committee, which were heard by Swiss representative Martin Dumermuth from the Federal Office for Justice, Switzerland has one year in which to respond and to update the committee on steps taken to redress these issues. and agencies/dos


Full story here Are you the author?
About Swissinfo
SWI – the international service of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC). Since 1999, has fulfilled the federal government’s mandate to distribute information about Switzerland internationally, supplementing the online offerings of the radio and television stations of the SBC. Today, the international service is directed above all at an international audience interested in Switzerland, as well as at Swiss citizens living abroad.
Previous post See more for 3) Swiss Markets and News Next post
Tags: ,

🤞 Don’t miss posts anymore!
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Permanent link to this article:

1 comment

  1. Ole C G Olesen

    The UN has among other things promoted and suggested a POPULATION EXCHANGE

    of the European Populations in one of its official Publications

    This is in direct Contravention of UN STATUTES on GENOCIDE

    I cite from the Charter

    Article I

    The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

    Article II

    In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;

    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    Article III

    The following acts shall be punishable:

    (a) Genocide;

    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

    (d) Attempt to commit genocide;

    (e) Complicity in genocide.

    Article IV

    Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

    Article V

    The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III.

    The UN HUMAN RIGHTS GROUP should FxxK OFF !!

    Sorry for the language .. but it is the only appropriate answer

    to this RACIST and GENOCIDAL UN !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.