Previous post Next post

MAULDIN: Americans Will Pay for Trump’s "America First" Plan

Subscribe to John Mauldin's free weekly column, Thoughts from the Frontline, at Mauldin Economics: http://bit.ly/2kW5jCJ
Full story here Are you the author?
John Mauldin
Each week, investors and financial professionals around the globe turn to John Mauldin to better understand Wall Street, global markets, and the drivers of the world economy. And for good reason. John is a noted financial expert, a New York Times best-selling author, a pioneering online commentator, and the publisher of one of the first publications to provide investors with free, unbiased information and guidance—Thoughts from the Frontline—one of the most widely read investment newsletters in the world.
Previous post See more for 3.) Global News on Switzerland Economist Next post
Tags: ,

Permanent link to this article: https://snbchf.com/video/mauldin-mauldin-americans-pay-trump-quotamerica-firstquot-plan/

10 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Censor ed

    Americans always pay for Bush, Obama, corruption in the government, given money and weapon for terrorist. And maybe it is the time to give money to person , who is going to work for interests of us people

    1. hwy9nightkid

      english best asset, you think?

  2. ironstarAcles

    Some big fat cats will die… o the horror…

  3. Reid Butler

    8:52 "Prices go up, but your taxes come down RADICALLY…" — IN THEORY. I cannot remember many governments reducing taxes in exchange for an increase in taxes somewhere else.

  4. lissa leggs

    trump is a moron.
    Two yrs ago mauldin was pimping two oil drilling companies. To save his own azz likely.

  5. lissa leggs

    trump the crypto nazi.

  6. Andrew Steeves

    Free Trade-Globalizer SCUMBAG…

  7. George Winston

    A value-added tax is very regressive, hurting the poorest people the hardest. It also does nothing to bring jobs back to the United States, which has seen middle class jobs exported. The money saved only partially keeps prices low, because much of the savings simply goes to corporate profits , which against benefits the wealthy who hold financial instruments over the poor who hold none. In the 19th century, the US government was largely funded by tariffs, which allowed America to build native industries. I'm all for "free trade" but the truth is there hasn't been any free trade in the world for a long time. I don't think you've done an adequate job of backing up your arguement.

  8. Eagle Force

    Our median household incomes have declined 7% since China joined the WTO, so what is the point of free trade if it makes us poor and only capable of affording the cheap crap we just outsourced? Wall Street makes out like bandits, while middle America gets gutted. Seems fair. USA is the new Brazil?

  9. Eagle Force

    Wow, Mauldin, I'm sorry man, you need to get out of the ivory tower more often. When Ford moves its factory to Mexico, do they ever reduce the price on the vehicles they produce? While we might see stickier prices, seeing a price decrease is unlikely. Companies aren't outsourcing to reduce the price for consumers, they're moving to increase profitability, and this is reflected in the buoyant stock market reaching ever higher monuments.

    We are not protecting our economy from Mexican competition, we are protecting our economy from unscrupulous, American-when-it-suits-them multinational firms. I know deep down you know this, but hiding it and going with textbook trade theory shows a lack of understanding of your audience and followers looking to you for real insight. We are the students of international economics who grew up and realized the trade economics textbooks and lessons we were taught are a complete load of a four-letter-word. So lets get real here, you aren't giving a paid speech to Wall Street, you're talking candidly with the world. Tell us how we can really make America great again, like it was in the early '90's before NAFTA and China in the WTO, when everything was cheap and people could afford educations for their children, homes for their families, and retirements that were peaceful and fulfilling. Can you tell us how to get that back? And please don't tell me trade liberalization, when the trade deficit is wider than in 2012. Please don't tell me re-education, when the price is unaffordable and not likely to be obtained by someone who must first ensure their own survival.

    We've been listening to Luddites for a couple of centuries now, and yet we keep adapting and finding new ways to utilize labor. Technology is often blamed for the demise of labor, but no company is moving factories to Mexico because they have better robots.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.