by George Dorgan
My articles My siteAbout meMy videosMy books
Follow on:LinkedINTwitterSeeking Alpha
CFA SocietyEconomicBlogs
See the recent updates on banking union and remarks on the higher Southern European wealth on page 2.
June 22nd, 2012
Germany’s stance in the euro crisis: More than ESM will not be possible for many years
German politicians and the German Bundesbank believe that the Euro crisis can be only solved by supply side reforms as formulated in the Euro Plus Pact, reforms that were already successfully introduced during the Thatcher/Reagan era and in Germany between 2000 and 2007.
Merkel’s CDU does not want Eurobonds; for her party commonly issued bonds would be an incentive for the PIIGS not to implement austerity and supply-side reforms. The Fiscal Compact formalizes the austerity plan: It requires the strong reduction of government debt and a balanced budget rule. The ratification of the Fiscal Compact including the balanced budget rule is the precondition that countries may get access to the permanent European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which was originally designed to replace the temporary EFSF.
In December 2011 Germany and France advocated steps towards a fiscal union. According to Merkel a fiscal union would require that Brussels has to approve national budgets, a measure still rejected by France. Some commentators even suggest that the logical step of a fiscal union would be a centralized finance ministry under EU or German lead.
After France’s new president Francois Holland had revealed his plans to cut the pension age to 60 years, Merkel has promptly introduced the step of a political union including common economic policy and a loss of sovereignty towards Brussels (which would never have permitted the pension age reduction). Only after that a fiscal union would be possible.
The final step Eurobonds, i.e. unlimited common responsibility, implies directly unlimited transfers among member states. The same applies to a banking union.
In summary:
English-speaking press and many hedge funds are sure that Germany will pay
The French president and economists especially in the english-speaking countries and very influential papers like “The Financial Times” or “The Economist” want Germany to take anti-crisis measures and finally to shortcut the route to Eurobonds and a banking union, which implies German transfer payments and not only loans. At the same time their domestic countries, the UK and the US do not want a strong increase of their contributions to the IMF, whereas BRICs countries agreed to raise their payments to the IMF by 95 bln. US$.
Financial markets and hedge funds are of the strong believe that Germany will finally give in and allow for Eurobonds to avoid a global financial crisis.
As German native speakers we strongly suggest investors not to buy in what these papers are writing and what these hedge funds are betting on. We believe in what the German press and what German politicians and courts say.
Merkel’s stance against Eurobonds has hardened
First of all, Merkel assumes that Greece and even contagion to Italy and Spain is rather like the 1998 Asia crisis, but not a global downturn in the center of the financial system in the United States like the sub-prime crisis was. In the strong trust that no global crisis is imminent, Merkel has hardened her stance as compared to last autumn’s endless attempts to solve the crisis when many were fearing a US recession. And even if the global crisis comes: The world should not overestimate Germany‘s abilities. Last but not least, Finland, Austria and the Netherlands also oppose common bonds.
Even German socialist opposition now against Eurobonds
Together with increasing popular German protests against the ESM, even the German opposition (socialist SPD and greens) has recently rejected Hollande’s demands of a quick introduction of Eurobonds even if some months ago they were still in favor of them. Merkel’s coalition partner FDP compared Eurobonds to giving a box of whisky to an alcoholic. The German people’s opinion is 79% against Eurobonds and 14% in favor of them.
Instead the German opposition is in favor of a common “debt repayment fund” (or again a biased FT article), which would assume all euro zone debt beyond the threshold of 60% debt, financed by common bonds. All debt under 60% will still belong to the single countries. The debtors, i.e. all nations in the euro zone would be required to repay all debt in 25 years and accept the conditions of even stronger supply-side reforms than the Stability and Growth Pact. The Bundesbank swiftly rejected this idea, because the equivalent of 90% of German GDP would go to the fund every year.
Anything beyond ESM is against the German constitution
Already the ESM, on which Germany could theoretically earn money, borrowing at 1 % and lending at 4% or more, has difficulties to pass the constitutional court. The German president Gauck will only sign the law, after the court has examined it. Last year, the court let the EFSF, the temporary bailout fund, pass. The German Wolfgang Münchau of the FT, an advocate of Eurobonds, explained that it will be a lot more difficult for a permanent bailout fund like the ESM to pass. Still it has a chance, it is a just lending some money to the other nations not a transfer, however a permanent lending. For Münchau a borderline case.
Anything beyond the ESM including a political, fiscal or banking union, Eurobonds or the debt repayment fund would require that the German people abolishes its Grundgesetz by a referendum and adopts a new constitution, a process that can take many years.
Bailout of the Eurozone would be Germany’s second bailout, already the first one was far too expensive
The first German full-blown “bailout”, namely the integration of the Eastern German part (only 17 million people) caused the Germany debt (see right) to triple from 430 bln. euro in 1989 to 1200 bln in 1999, a decade during which even the US managed to reduce debt for a couple of years. Germany greatly underestimated the integration costs. It let the country see a long phase of slow growth till 2006, and still now the west pays transfers to the east. Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus and Greece might be better developed now than the former communist GDR, but they count over 100 million people and might need more time than the 20 years the former Eastern Germans needed to cope up. This first bad experience is may be the main reason why Angela Merkel says that people should not overestimate Germany.
Eurobonds are light years away
As opposed to Germany, France is more reluctant to a central government or a severe central fiscal authority. It could destruct France’s dream of “La Grande Nation” and the strong desire of the French people to live in a welfare state. Other economists think that Germany will prevent the fiscal union:
Fiscal union requires a large EU budget to share risks, some debt mutualization & a large transfer union. Germany & core object to all 3
— Nouriel Roubini (@Nouriel) November 24, 2012
The final step, Eurobonds and permanent transfer payments are “light years away”, as Tim Duy put it in Economonitor. Before these permanent transfer payments happen, the euro zone might have been dissolved and recreated in some different forms several times. Eurobonds are hence pure utopia.
This entry was cross-posted in the testosterone pit blog on June 22nd.
George Dorgan (penname) predicted the end of the EUR/CHF peg at the CFA Society and at many occasions on SeekingAlpha.com and on this blog. Several Swiss and international financial advisors support the site. These firms aim to deliver independent advice from the often misleading mainstream of banks and asset managers.
George is FinTech entrepreneur, financial author and alternative economist. He speak seven languages fluently.
See more for
